10.17.2012

supper club

Naught for nothing, but at my job we have REAL binders full of women.  Well-qualified women who specialize in care-giving and nurturing and problem-solving and are seeking full- and part-time work as public health or social service workers.  Civil service workers.

Some people say Social/Civil Servants.  We aren't allowed to say that here.  We also can't say "chief" or "monkey".  We have weird PC standards.

We women in this field need the flexibility it can provide to chaperone school field trips.  Take care of sick babies.  Sick kids.  Sick parents.  Take care of our own bodies.  And minds.  We need to work our schedules around school drop-off times and school pick-up times and baseball games and ballet practices and chess club dismissals and parent-teacher conferences.

Some of us don't want to be Stay At Home Moms.  Some of us don't have a choice.

Most of the women in my office are solely responsible for the health benefits of their family.  Social service jobs usually come with ridiculously great fringe benefits.  We need the extra days off and health insurance benefits because our partners aren't usually able to provide them for us.  Their jobs aren't flexible.  Their jobs often don't offer health care benefits on the side and more days off than you can shake a stick at.  Our partners may be able to provide us with enough money to pay the bills, but how many are able to leave their jobs early when someone pukes in math class?  How many are able to make every basketball game?  Sit down with the family at (a reasonable) dinner time?  Read bedtime stories?  Kiss the little ones goodnight?  Stay up late enough to watch the news together?  Make love?

In order to run a fiscally secure household in today's times, someone often has to give up flexibility.  The type of job that most bread-winning adults have is the sort where you can't just get up and leave.  Be it cashier or heart surgeon.  The type of job that at least one of us in a two-parent arrangement/household needs to "support a family" doesn't usually support what our families need most of. 

Time. 

Family dinners are important.  Family game nights make a difference.  Family reading time.  Family giggle time.  Family presence at sporting events and dance recitals and science fairs mean a whole damned lot to a kid. And to a parent.  Our kids can be just as over-scheduled and as inflexible as we are.  That should change.
The whole family, whatever that might mean to you in your house, needs to be present among one another.  One mom and kid(s), one dad and kid(s), two dads and kid(s), one mom and dad and kid(s).  Two moms and kid(s).  One dad, one grandparent and kid(s).  Whatever.

No matter what your political affiliation, no matter how ridiculous it sounds when someone says that a woman's place is in the kitchen or in a binder, there is an underlying truth to what everyone seems up in arms about today.  Sure it wasn't presented well last night, and it may not have been relevant to the issue addressed and it wasn't said in the most gentle of ways, but there is a point to be honored. 

A family's place is in the kitchen.  Making dinner.  Ordering dinner in.  Eating at the dinner table.  Hanging out at soccer practice.  Catching all the mathlete competitions.  Together.  We don't get much together time. 

Together time, especially chatty together time that happens around a dinner table, does prevent gun violence.  Drug use.  Smoking.  Drinking.  Sexing.  Bullying.  Failing grades.  Depression.  And worse.  It's science.  Proven through years of research on the subject.

We all need that flexibility to get home to make dinner.
Every man, woman, and child.  Every worker, every pavement pounder, every non-worker.
Flexibility with our time.
To be together.
To talk.

And we need better healthcare that isn't tied to our jobs.

(Drops microphone and walks away.)

11 comments:

susan said...

That sound? That's a standing ovation coming at you from way over here. I wish there was a way to make this mandatory reading for every person registered to vote in this year's election. I wish there was a way to make every person registered to vote in this year's election open minded enough to honestly consider the wisdom and simplicity in what you write.

Ann said...

Thank goodness. I am not the only one who is perplexed by the shrill FB meme's that are protesting too much about something we all know is true.

Romney is, arguably, one of the least verbally gifted POTUS candidates ever, but he somehow manages to put uncomfortable truths out there that make people screech rather than go "yeah, that thing".

Pamela said...

preaching truth again.
most excellent.

Actuary Mom said...

As much as I hate mitt, and I do. And as much as I hated the way he said it, he is right. I have been offered flex time, and I took it. Mostly so I can have time to make dinner. Now I'm going to cry in the bathroom about how I've set back feminism 20 years.

Actuary Mom said...

Really though, I'm thankful, but I also realize by taking this flexibility I'm slowing my upward mobility. I'm widening the gender wage gap. I will get passed by on the next promotion because I leave work at 2. I will get passed by because I leave mid-day for my kids doctors appointments.

I've accepted that, because for me family time wins (but I guess money also wins, since I'm working and not staying at home).

lacochran's evil twin said...

Well put.

Shan G said...

Amen and well said!! Children need at least one parent who can always be there for them. They need to know THEY matter more than anything or anyone else.

Although our money situation sucks giant donkey balls right now, I am eternally grateful that I can attend my daughter's school functions, award ceremonies and class parties. I drop her off and pick her up every day. If the school calls to tell me she's running a fever, I can go get her without a second thought. If she's sick, I don't have to grovel to a boss about how I have to stay home and take care of my child. And oh, by the way, please don't fire me for being a mom.

And to Ann -- you said about Romney what I was having trouble verbalizing. Thank you. :)

Andrea (ace1028) said...

Well written, well said. Good points.

I still think the binder thing was a horrible gaffe, even more so because it was supposedly untrue.

C'est la vie. What can you do, right? Except vote for who you want to vote for and see what happens.

America, America ...

Domestic Goddess said...

BInders are great for organizing the scores of women at your beck and call.

Jessica Watson said...

Amen.

kelsi said...

There was something in Romney's turn of phrase that took me days to pinpoint and articulate - but my problem was less with the binders and more with the "if we're going to have women in the workforce, we're going to have to be flexible."

In this case "we" = men. It does not = Americans. And "if" is the grossest word he could use in that context. And the takeaway suggestion is that "IF we're going to have weak creatures who have to make dinner for their families in the workforce, we're going to have to make some sacrifices. For those weak creatures."
Everyone deserves the flexibility and dinner together, but not at the expense of dodging the actual question he was being asked about fair pay. It seemed to me like he avoided the question regarding fair pay by justifying the differential with "we have to be flexible."
I have so much to say about this, but I'm getting incoherent. You know what I mean.
XO.